Trust / Release pipeline
A red test suite will not start the service
Every change reaches production through a pipeline that runs the full automated test suite and refuses to restart the application if the suite fails.
The interesting number is not the test count. It is that the deployment is gated on the result rather than the result being advisory.
Ask about the pipelineWhat stops a bad change from reaching our claims data?
A gate, not a review. The full suite runs on every release and a failure stops the deployment mechanically. Schema changes are ordered and reversible — each with a defined way back — so a bad structural change is recoverable rather than final.
The gate
What happens between a commit and your data
- 01
The full suite runs
The full suite, not a selected subset chosen for speed. A partial run is a partial answer, and partial answers are how regressions reach production.
- 02
A failure stops the restart
The pipeline refuses to bring the new version up. Nobody decides whether the failure was important — that judgment call is exactly what goes wrong at 6pm on a Friday.
- 03
Migrations are ordered and reversible
Every schema migration, applied in sequence, each with a defined reversal. A structural change that turns out to be wrong is a rollback rather than an incident report.
- 04
Vocabulary checks run as tests
Automated checks fail the build if invoicing and premium-billing language cross. The most expensive conceptual confusion in the domain is enforced by the test suite.
- 05
Monitoring watches the schedules
Dead-man alarms fire if a scheduled job — a backup, a restore verification, a sweep — stops happening. A silent absence is the failure mode that ordinary alerting misses.
The build, in figures
Numbers that describe the shipped platform
These describe what runs today. They are not projections, and they do not count work in progress — the roadmap is listed separately and deliberately.
| Measure | Current |
|---|---|
| Automated tests per release | 2,757, run in full, gating the restart |
| Schema migrations | 245, ordered and reversible |
| API endpoints | Scoped to your organization, every one |
| Database tables | 167, of which 88 are primary entities |
| Vocabulary enforcement | Automated checks fail the build on invoicing/billing language crossover |
| Scheduled-job monitoring | Dead-man alarms on backups and restore verification |
What a test suite does not prove
A gated pipeline with reversible migrations is a strong engineering position. It is not a claim about uptime, and we will not dress it up as one.
Tests prove intent, not correctness
the full suite encode what we believed should be true. A defect nobody thought to test for passes the suite as happily as correct code.
This is not a redundancy story
A gated pipeline says changes are safe to deploy. It says nothing about failover, and we would rather you ask that question directly — see backups and recovery for the honest answer.
No published SLA yet
We are not going to quote an availability figure we have not operated long enough to stand behind. Ask us what we actually run and what our recovery objective is.